Type of object | Sculpture or other artwork |
Current situation | Destroyed |
Current location, if known | Allowed to decay in situ |
Notes | Constructed from peat logs/briquettes - an early example of environmental, degradable art, it was allowed to decay over the course of the Festival/ |
2 comments
Add information for this object
You can also email us if you prefer, or if you have any enquiries related to submitting material.
By submitting this form, you agree that you solely own the rights to the material supplied, and that 'After the Garden Festival...' will have the right to reuse that material, for the purposes of this website, social media or any publication or materials derived from it. You will be given credit, as per the name provided, on any use of your supplied images. In the event of an approach by a third party to reuse your image, we will direct such a request to you by email. We are happy to discuss specific terms - please email us in these cases.
I was a recently graduated sculpture student from GSA in 1988. I was employed by the art team (the Director of Arts was the formidable Isabelle Vasseur) to support and install a number of the sculptures on the site. One of the sculptures I worked on was Sjoerd Buisman’s phyllotaxis. I worked directly with Snoerd for 2 weeks to build the sculpture. The sculpture was a circular spiral shape about 1m high by about 6m in diameter. Interestingly it was built in situ made completely out of freshly cut peat logs/briquettes, which were delivered on pallets. Me and Sjoerd built the entire sculpture out of these peat bricks, one by one, like peat Lego. It was meant to degrade and decay over time and was never meant to be permanent- it was an early example of environmental and degradable art. PS, I also worked on a number of other sculpture installations at the GGF- including the Saniel Buren striped shipping bollards.
Stephen – thanks so much for getting in touch. This is fascinating – all we previously knew about Phyllotaxis Scotland is its appearance in the official guide to the Artworks Programme – on re-examination the construction material seems clear; I assume we can safely say it was allowed to degrade in situ to the extent we can mark it as ‘destroyed’. Would be very keen to hear more details around Buren’s ‘170 Bollards’, which – given its partly extant state – is a work of greater current significance. We’ll send you an email… thanks again!